If you live inside Facebook, I’m pretty sure you’ve already seen someone posting this video, (or maybe you’ve posted it yourself to perpetuate the chain). However, on several occasions I’ve pointed out that the alleged account of a classroom encounter between young Albert Einstein and an atheist professor is FICTION. The exchanges never took place, and Albert Einstein, whom many deem the most intelligent person who ever lived, is not a Christian.
Moreover, we know it’s not true because Einstein, the most famous scientist of the 20th century responsible for the famous E=mc2 equation, was a careful thinker who would never have put forward the specious logic attributed to him.
Comparing Apples to Oranges
Does cold exist? or is it simply the absence of heat? Well, both heat and cold are actually labels physicists give to varying degrees in temperature. What exists is temperature. High or low. We call “cold” the lowest level of heat.
Does darkness exist? or is it simply the absence of light? Well, there are degrees of darkness as there are degrees of light, since light is made of sub-atomic particles called photons. Hence, a dark object reflects fewer visible photons than other objects, and therefore appears dim in comparison. (One example is Dark Matter. Astronomers theorize it makes up 25% of the known universe. This could be classified as darkness because it is invisible matter.)
Now, does evil exist? or is it simply the absence of good? Here is the heart of the problem, the previous two given contrasts — cold VS heat, dark VS light — concern physical properties of the universe, meaning material existence. Evil is not physical, because it has no mass, energy, etc., and it’s not quantifiable. So evil is not the same as cold and darkness, as the young student (not Einstein) wrongfully said.
Therefore the whole proposition of the video crumbles into pieces when you notice that the analogy is wrong. Saying evil happens when man does not have God’s love present in his heart is no help either, since it’s basically a self-serving non-argument without the slightest foundation of fact.
The Real Albert Einstein
“I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. “
-Albert Enstein, letter to an atheist (1954), quoted in Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas & Banesh Hoffman
“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. “
- Albert Einstein, “Religion and Science,” New York Times Magazine, November 9, 1930


Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr

god is a concept by which we measure our pain….
Most Atheists are really Agnostics! In the profoundest sense, there’s really no such thing as pure Atheism…
and…?
atheism has a wider scope than agnosticism…. agnosticism focuses only about denying the existence of deity. in short, being skeptic. while atheism is general. it denies the whole religions and beliefs about divine beings like god, spirits and others.
the way Einstein thinks here is for a specific thing… and about the good and evil… for me, evil is natural to humans. what i mean is not really evil but bad attitude. for example, try to raise a child without a guide… then observe how he/she acts. you can’t see any good deeds about that child because there is no people or things that can teach him/her how to be good. good is just a replacement for evil for you to associate with other people. and another thing… for me, good and bad don’t exist. it is just a classification of motion according to our mind. if you think it is bad, then it is bad, if they think it is good, then it is good for them.