Sen. Sotto turned his own personal tragedy into fair game when he used his son's death as an example for his plagiarized argument on the health hazards of contraceptives.
Senator Tito Sotto suffered a personal loss with the death of his son. We understand his grief. What we cannot understand is why he chose to rely on an unknown blogger to explain his son's death.
Right before asserting that he lost a child due to contraceptives, Sotto said he has scientific proof about the “damaging effects to children born from mothers who were using contraceptives prior to their pregnancy.” He then went on a lengthy explanation about gut imbalance, opportunistic flora, exposure of the fetus to toxins and zinc depletion.
His scientific proof was copied entirely and almost word-for-word from an article by a blogger calling herself “Sarah, the Healthy Home Economist.”
Epalwatch is a worthy cause. It keeps public servants on their toes and keeps them from willfully using their position of power to spend public funds in an effort to advertise themselves for re-election well before they even file their candidacy.
The following is a letter sent to the office of Congressman Vincent Crisologo via their online form on the Philippine House of Representatives Website.
People were ecstatic. People were claiming PNoy had finally put his foot down regarding RH.
But I don’t buy it. And neither should anyone else, most especially fellow pro-RH advocates.
Earlier this year, an Indonesian named Alexander Aan went on Facebook and expressed his doubt of the existence of God, and in return was attacked by a mob, arrested, and convicted for "disseminating information aimed at inciting religious hatred or hostility." Many of his countrymen now call for his death.