REPORT Secularism Violations
Humor

Why the RH Bill is bad: The Real Truth behind the Supposed Truth about the RH Bill

Dustin Celestino
Dustin Celestino

I used to support the RH Bill. I no longer do. By the end of this document, neither would you. I have not supported the RH Bill since I attended a lecture in Megamall about the truth behind it. That lecture truly enlightened me. My only hope is that this holy light of enlightenment passes through your monitor screen, into your optical nerves, and into your heart so it can touch your soul (because the soul is in the heart). My intent here is not to antagonize Pro-RH people, but to enlighten – so listen up, you narrow-minded morons. Open your minds to the real truth…

The RH Bill will put Filipinos at risk of extinction, because, at its very core, the RH Bill is an extension of a secret, global conspiracy – a western attempt – to implement principles of eugenics on unsuspecting, inferior populations in order to exclude them from the human evolutionary process, at the end of which would, at the apex, summon forth THE MASTER RACE. Anyone who failed to see this after the lecture is ignorant. I advise him or her to do his or her research, better yet, do some soul-searching to discover the real truth, because the truth is in our hearts, we just have to listen to it.

Initially, my layman’s interpretation of the RH Bill led me to think that it was just a bill meant to help educate the uninformed about ways to prevent them from fornicating their way to a very bad financial situation. My ignorant mind devised 10 simple points as to why the RH Bill was right.

I thought:

1. The minimum wage – the lowest an employer can pay an employee – of a non-agricultural Filipino worker is P404.

2. If there were 20 working days in a month (because most people don’t work on the weekend), the average minimum-wage-earning Filipino would earn around P8,000 a month.

3. Let’s call that person, Joey. If Joey, like other human beings, ate food on a regular basis, he will spend around P70/day on food (and that’s a very, very conservative assumption). There are 30 days in a month, so I guess, that would amount to P2,100 a month.

4. But if Joey had a wife that he loved, he might want to feed her too. Feeding her would cost another P2,100 a month.

5. P8,000 – P4,200 = P3,800

6. If Joey and his wife rented a home, or used electricity and bathed from time to time, the amount left from Joey’s salary would be significantly reduced. Let’s say their utility bills and rent amounted to P1800.

7. P3,800 – P1800 = P2,000

8. P2,000 is a lot of money, but I don’t think Joey and his wife should have more than 3 children, right? I mean, I don’t have children, but just by looking at one, I can safely assume that they cost more than P1,000/month. Babies need milk, diapers, toys, immunity injections, baby medicine…

9. From this I deduced that babies cost money. If babies cost money, I theorized that having more babies would cost more money. And from this data, I observed that a person who spent a lot of money on children, but didn’t earn a lot of money, would soon be broke and unable to provide for both himself and his children. Another word for this broke situation is poverty.

10. I theorized that a person can avoid being poor by making less babies. So, I thought that steps should be taken to inform people about this very little known fact. I also thought that the government should make contraceptives accessible so that people who don’t earn a lot can properly manage the little resources that they have. That’s why I supported the RH Bill.

But now I know that I was wrong. And here are some of the reasons why I know that. By the way, before I continue, I must say that this is the truth, guys. In fact, it’s more than the truth. It’s the Catholic truth, which means that it’s truer and more true than the regular truth.

I know that the issue of the RH Bill is not a religious issue, but make sure you pay attention if you want your soul to be saved. Here are some of the things I learned from the lecture I learned:

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that the Philippines is overpopulated.”

I agree. I, myself, have observed that the Philippine is NOT overpopulated. In fact, if you use your common sense and think about it, you will realize a few things:

1. We are not overpopulated! Look at the mountains, the jungles, the caves and the ocean floor. There are no people there!

2. If we were really overpopulated, we would have trouble travelling. But if you go to EDSA, there’s no traffic. When you ride the MRT, it’s not packed with people.

3. Students in public schools are well educated because the teacher to student ratio is very low. In fact, because of our low population the government can basically guarantee that all public school students are provided books, notebooks and other school supplies.

 

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that contraceptives are good for mankind and women.”

1. I agree, the RH Bill is not good for women because it might draw a woman away from her one, true, universal purpose – the uninterrupted production of healthy babies.

2. Furthermore, the role of women in society and the universe is to make babies. That’s why God made women. That’s their sole purpose in life. They’re not good for anything else. Ever wonder why there are no women in the clergy? Because they’re not good enough.

3. Contraceptives would allow women to enjoy the benefits of physical intimacy while maintaining a successful and productive career, if she so chooses. That is so wrong. Only men should be able to enjoy that privilege.

4. Women should get pregnant every single time they have sex and only immoral women enjoy sex without the possibility of conception. In fact, a better alternative would be for women, in general, to follow the example made by Mother Mary – to learn how to conceive without having sex.

 

 

“The RH bill will put Filipinos at risk of extinction!”

1. I agree. If we pass the RH bill, we will become extinct, like dinosaurs. The dinosaurs are all dead. If we don’t want to be extinct, we should not pass the RH Bill. I mean, do you really want to be a dinosaur?

2. In my opinion, it wouldn’t even be far-fetched to speculate that the most probable reason the dinosaurs became extinct was because they used contraceptives.

3. Population decline is just bad for nations. Just look at the countries which have a declining population – Italy, Japan and Singapore. They’re in such a bad shape. The Philippines obviously has a better economy and has a higher literacy rate than these countries. In fact, many Italians, Japanese, and Singaporeans go to the Philippines for work. That only goes to show that a decline in population is bad for the economy.

 

 

“Our population is our biggest asset!”

1.  In my opinion, people should make as many babies as they can because the population is not a problem. In fact, the more babies a person has, the more assets he has. Forget real estate properties, stock investments, or Jollibee franchises. The real secret to increased wealth is babies.

2. If you have 15 babies, you’re practically wealthy because babies are assets:

2.1 If you need money, you can sell them.

2.2 If you can keep them alive until they can walk, they can one day beg for money in the streets – they’re going to have to anyway because there’s no way in hell you’ll be able to provide for all of them on your own.

3. If ever a person is not able to feed the 15 babies he made, it’s the governments fault, because it’s the governments sole responsibility to make sure that every Filipino baby is fed.

4. The best way a person can contribute to his country is to contribute to its population.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that reproductive education and contraceptives will effectively reduce cases of abortion.”

1. Reproductive/contraceptive education will have no effect on the number of abortion cases. In my opinion, these abortion cases will not lessen because women will continue to have abortions regardless of whether they are pregnant or not.

2. Abortions cannot be prevented. It’s just something that women naturally do. Like shopping, for example.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it will make people participate in extra-marital and pre-marital sex.”

1. By approving the RH Bill, we as a nation, are practically encouraging our people to engage in immoral activities.

2. We must protect our moral values and reject the RH Bill. Because, currently, not a single Filipino engages in pre-marital sex or extra-marital sex. As soon as this bill is approved, Filipino people will run the streets naked and start a national orgy!

3. The root cause of extra-marital and pre-marital sex is one’s exposure to contraceptives. There is just something in contraceptives that people find very arousing.

4. In Western countries, men lure strange women into bed by showing them condoms.

5. If we ban condoms, absolutely no one would engage in pre-marital or extra-marital sex.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that parents don’t teach their children about sex.”

1. The truth is that parents talk to their children about sex all the time. It’s so not awkward. The dad usually tells his children how he takes off all his clothes, does a sexy Tiger growl and makes sweet, sweet music with their mother’s body.

2. Also, a father usually advises his daughter that if she’s going to have sex with her boyfriend, she should use a condom. Sometimes the father even drives the daughter to the boyfriend’s house and waits for the couple to finish.

3. Filipino daughters don’t have sex without the father’s permission. Unwanted pregnancies or teen pregnancies never happen to Filipino girls. That’s why we do not need the RH Bill.

 

“The RH Bill is a conspiracy.”

1. It’s lies, all lies!

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because the priest said so, and priests are never wrong.”

The biggest reason why we should not pass the RH Bill is because the priests told us that we shouldn’t. As anyone should know, priests, men of the clergy, should be the authority on sexual and reproductive matters because they have the most knowledge and experience with sex and reproduction. They are true sexperts – legendary masters of erotic affairs. If you are a real Catholic, you would do everything they say, because they’re always right.

Related content

2864 comments

  2. Don't vote for RH Bill. Our country still needs to produce idiots who don't understand satire. They unwittingly give us good laughs. They belong to another class of comedians, don't they? If their numbers decline then there would be a few people to entertain us.

  3. why do you have to use sarcasm? it's just stupid. you're proving something to be wrong or bad, and you're using sarcasm – IN A WRONG WAY.

    Why say that the Philippines is NOT overpopulated, when in fact it is. Using sarcasm here does not make sense for me. The other strong point of RH bill is for overpopulation. It just does not make sense.

  4. Uh oh why some people read English articles that they don't understand? Satires are really fun! Pun pun fun!

  5. Though I disagree with the author (me being pro-life), I am entertained by how he presented the article in satire. Being childish in dialogues brings colour to this overly serious topic. Wag lang palagian. I think humor is a universal language that brings opposing views to a temporary convergence. Kudos to the author!

  6. " Population decline is just bad for nations. Just look at the countries which have a declining population – Italy, Japan and Singapore. They’re in such a bad shape. The Philippines obviously has a better economy and has a higher literacy rate than these countries. In fact, many Italians, Japanese, and Singaporeans go to the Philippines for work. That only goes to show that a decline in population is bad for the economy."

    LOL!!!! Hahahaha! Especially some of the comments… LMFAO!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  9. Ang daming nakaapak ng kamote. >=)) Peace ya'll. Magbasa kasi muna bago magcomment. Chill.

    • Ang galing nga eh. Malay natin may mga di nagbabasa na anti-RH Billers tapos ipinapasa pala ang link na to hahaha… =P

  11. what a deviously written satire. I was starting to hate the article somewhere in the "NOT overpopulated part" until I realized that no true Manila-born Filipino would write that EDSA is not affected by traffic..

    great article.. to all the twats who react negatively, go kill yourselves..

  12. it's better that you have started with the outrageous facts from the bottom cause sarcasm was more obvious there. the overpopulation ideas at the beginning somehow enraged people because it was blurry if you were just sarcastic or plain in denial. as such, they did not bother reading the rest of the article and hastily assumed that you are indeed antiRH

  14. A funny, well written piece. And the comments…… BOOM. A mix of sorry little dumbasses who missed the entire point of the article and fucking know-it-alls who think that because they understood the premise of sarcasm, they're fucking geniuses who founded the principles of physics.

  17. PEOPLE, hold your horses. We need not be hostile with one another. Let's put it this way, some people are not equipped to recognize sarcasm. Let us mourn their loss for not being able to fully appreciate this wonderful piece of writing.

    • sarcasm shouldnt be used on delicate matters. it complicates things. use of sarcasm is just bad journalism.

      • Hey, I'm a Journalism graduate. I know for a fact that this isn't a news or feature article. This is an essay Nat. This isn't bad journalism, he used a literary device to deliver his message.

      • OMG Nat! Have you been taking everything you read in the Net seriously? And you equate this as journalism? hahahahaha.

        Trolled!

  18. Nation, this article speaks of nothing but absolute truthiness. It does the heart good to know that there are great Patriotic Filipinos out there who know that this nation needs to stand against the RH Bill!

    However, there is a far greater menace than the RH Bill. True, the RH Bill must be stopped, because it leads to pre-marital and extra-marital sex. But has anyone ever considered the leading cause for pre-MARITAL and extra-MARITAL sex?

    MARRIAGE, that's what. If marriage doesn't exist, then there would be NO pre- or extra- marital affairs.

    Therefore, we must not only ban the RH Bill, but marriage as well. It is our only hope.

    • Hahaha, Marcelle i like that

      Then we might as well forget any law at all. National law, Spiritual law (moral law).
      No marriage. No committment.
      Kita nga natin ang daming single parents and rebellious children, result of broken families. Kapag walang committment, how can you ensure your partner will be with you for life and bear the responsibilties of raising a family with you till you die? How can you gain SSS or any government benefits for families?

      If your 'partner' jump in bed with your bestfriend or neighbor, and bears a child by accident, ok lang siguro if you are not prone to jealousy anyway. Otherwise, baka mapatay mo pa silang lahat. Then again, why be afraid to kill, why not abolish all forms of law and just fornicate to our heart's content.

      Laws or regulations are made to protect the people. Not to restrict for the sake of restriction. True freedom is not giving in to your fleshly cravings and impulses. Like animals.

    • Go one step back and you will see that the problem is actually sex. Therefore, sex should be made illegal and we should only continue life by creating an army of androids.

      • Gasp! Are you working for Skynet, by any chance? Or the Architect? That sounds like something only the Machines would suggest.

        I, for one, welcome our cybernetic overlords.

      • hahaha.. nice one! artificially? may the church would also reject the idea of artificial insemination or the so-called "capsuled babies".. hehehe.. anyway just a seg-way.

  20. Had fun with the article.. had even more fun on the exchange of comments.. What I can say is humans should learn about literature before learning to use a computer.. xD

  21. this is such a weird article. kudos to the writer for being REALLY REALLY convincing at some parts. i was almost outraged at the things enumerated if it weren't for the other things that were too far-fetched or ridiculous. at least those pulled me back XD.
    anyway, i think those who are still a little jaded about the whole philippine system or too cynical should really look at other articles on the matter. the RH bill also tackles women who are nearly dying whether on hospital beds or on cardboard boxes in alley ways. (personally this should be the one more debated on). it tackles that gray area on induced abortions and unintended abortions in the country.
    it's not just the poor communities or the couple who can't afford a condom or the family with too many kids who'll get benefits from the RH bill.
    heck, if it were me, i'll not change just reproductive health in the philippines, i'd change the whole health care system of our country! (but please don'task how, i can only think so far)
    bottom line, this is just another angle on a very sensitive poltical issue. meanwhile women in the street are dying because they've been "illegally aborting".

  23. marami sa mga taong nagcocomment na sarcasm ito, nalaman lang na sarcasm ito nung nabasa yung mga comments sa post ni rashine. aminin 🙂

    pero promise cross my heart mamatay man. totoo talaga ito. isa talagang realization sakin ito <3

  27. omg, dustin_celestino. I am a huge fan. I knows it is that you is serious like Joker. <3

  28. I could not finish reading your article because it annoyed me. This is outrageous! From where did you take your facts?

  31. First of, cheers to the author (and to the epic comments! It really made my day! LOL)

    For those bashing Pinoys as stupid and Catholics in general and referring to pro's as fags .. uhm you're uncool too in my book.

    If there's anything I'm against about the RH bill it is that it would only give license for more graft and corruption.

    Like seryoso, our maid and her friends can get free condoms talaga? Would they even know where the community clinic is?

    The RH bill only addresses the married breeding couples. Ang tanong, kasal ba naman ba muna mga tao? How about those who have 8 panganays?

    People can be educated even without this bill. Gastos lang yan. And if you want to have safe sex, buy your own condom.

    Tingin ko naman, hindi naman nagulat yung nanay na one day she woke up with 8 kids na. She wanted to have 8 kids thats why she has 8 kids.

    Baka the government can just subsidize Trust condoms. LOL But hey, thats a better idea than giving it a away for FREEEEEE! Or you get a condom for every Lotto ticket you buy.

    I'm all for population control and contraceptives. And thats not even the issue here because you can buy that already in your friendly Mercury Drug Store. The issue here is giving it away for free. Racket lang to ng politicians. Read the RH bill. A part there talks about having a van per district and a TV for the RH drive. I'm sure gagamitin lang yan pang-sundo ng anak sa school. And the TV, well baka sa maid's room ang bagsak nyan.

    I read somewhere that the free medicine at the centers are just getting expired. Pasweldo na lang natin yung money sa public school teachers. Sayang lang yan.

    One more thing, how do you classify 'POOR'? This RH bill is for the poor daw. Is there an accreditation center ba in Manila that would declare you poor? What are the criteria's for this? Unemployment? Malamang walang ganyan.

    Read the RH bill .. when this is passed, pasado pati lahat ng flaws .. and mark my word, there would be loop holes here para sa corruption.

    • lahat naman ng bill/law, may possibility for corruption. tignan mo ung sa fertilizer fund. sana lang siguro ay bumoto ng mga matinong leaders ang mga pilipino sa future.

      saka tama, di naman kelangan gumastos para ma-educate ang mga tao. pero kelangan ng pera para maging available ang reproductive health care sa mga mahihirap. kelangan bumili ng mga gamot, at mag-hire ng mga nurses, doctor, midwife, etc. sana lang talaga ay hindi kurakutin ung pondo.

      • i don't think so. he doesn't understand the bill. asking about criteria for poor? that's the dumbest comment.

        • but seriously, so I just declare myself poor and I can get free contraceptives na? Can the government really support everyone who wants to get free contraceptives? E how?

          How will this be regulated then?

          I'm all for educating the public…. BUT isn't that being done in the schools already? Arent the condom companies advertising already?

          Grass roots level, this will not do shit I tell you. You'll just have another miraculous unexplained government condom contract lang na naman nyan.

          People, the RH bill is not about legalizing contraceptives in the Philippines. Its not about cutting down pre-marital sex. Its about FREE access to contraceptives. As in Libre.

          • Well guys, I don't know about loopholes for government corruption, but SOMETHING has to be done to educate women about their options, and before anyone puts words in my mouth I don't mean abortion.

            I have a sister who works in PGH and she's seen with her own eyes how women suffer from having too many kids and not getting proper pre-natal care. And come on, as a kid, I would rather I was born because my parents wanted me and consciously tried to conceive me rather than being their 8th "mistake" which is what my sister hears from her patients sometimes. She hates seeing women so resigned and tired. And you know what their word for sex is? They say "ginamit ako."

            My maid almost died giving birth but thankfully my mom paid for the doctors to treat her complications. Not everybody is as lucky, and I, along with the pro-RH Bill people, are hoping that this RH bill will help save lives and improve the quality of life of the people.

            Furthermore, condoms are cheap, but when you're struggling to make ends meet and you have 4-10 mouths to feed, I imagine you wouldn't really be able to spare a few pesos for some condoms. And condoms are not the only method of contraception, they're going to teach women NOT just about contraception but about the importance of pre-natal care and that natural family planning/fertility cycle the Catholic Church is SO in favor of.

            I can't deny there will probably be loopholes that politicians will use to get their hands on some money, but that doesn't mean passing this bill will be totally useless. The conditions in PGH are pitiful probably as a result of the same greedy politicians, but thanks to that government hospital being there int the first place, the doctors do the best they can with what they have and they do manage to save some lives. The RH Bill will (hopefully) give them more resources to give women a better quality of life. I just find it funny that both the pro and anti-RH people have the same concern in mind: LIFE – but we all have such radically different ideas as to how to promote this.

          • Very well said Angelica.

            I do think however that for every 'surprised' woman, there's that irresponsible husband who will still not change despite this bill. From how you said it, these women undergone marital rape. Now, we already have a law for that.

            As for pre-natal care and saving the lives of poor women in labor, I'm all for that. Maybe a health care bill would be more apt for this. I'd want to save the lives of those having heart attacks too.

            I'm all for education. Kung meron ngang pang-load, I'm sure they'd have a budget for contraceptives too if they believe in this.

      • oo nga. ipatupad niyo na RH Bill para umonti yung mga tangang Pilipino. Please lang. nakakahawa kasi katangahan e. natatakot ako parang nahahawa na din ako.

    • I do like the way you argue and somehow, it enlightened me. I was actually pro RH Bill before I read your post. And yes definitely(ONLY in the Philippines) there would be loop holes. Nevertheless, I'm still not against it because apparently, population bloom should be controlled. What I am against with is the part of the RH Bill wherein every district will have a van and a TV. Why not just educate the mass through the use of media like in TVs and radios. Anyway, thanks again for the post.

      • Go google the RH bill. Its posted in some website. I just think people should be more discerning, rather than immediately getting on the bandwagon of being PRO-RH.

        Thanks for the kind words

  32. hey dude. you are so smart.

    by the way, do you know what sarcasm and satire is?
    go ask Mr. Webster.

  33. This article is so good that I'll become an Anti-RH Bill supporter too!! Go blind faith for the religious fundamentalists!

    • Ikaw na! Ang talino mo eh no? Kapag nag publish ka ng article sa web, kahit sino pwede makabasa. Kung gusto mong "FREETHINKERS" kuno lang makabasa i private mo and members lng ang payagan mo maka access. Minsan mag isip ka kuya ha

  35. If you still failed to realize that this is a SATIRE, then you should think twice before calling someone STUPID.

  38. alam nyo, the mere fact na may sumeseryoso at nagagalit (like garz, hello garz. hehe) is bec such people are aware of the truth. And the truth is, the Philippines is in shit, and it needs action now.

    isang malaking TOINK. 🙂

  39. this person supports child slavery? wow. FREE THINKER FTW.

    how stupid is the writer? andaming mali sa calculations mo. bobo.

  41. We need a better education on literature. Some people just can't discern a satire when they see one. Heck, they probably don't even know what a satire is 🙁

    As for the article, kudos! Just saw some grammatical errors, but I think it was intended hehe..

  43. Careful, author. While I think your article is very effective, I think it will be effective only to a small portion of our populace. Most of the comments here just prove it so.
    I once watched a documentary (foreign) where they did an interview with Lito Atienza, regarding his decision to make contraception inaccessible to women. What he answered? "Contraception is poison. Don't you read the internet? It's a pesticide you put inside a woman." When asked about the rising rates of abortion after this move, he walked away, saying repeatedly, "No, you're wrong. You're wrong."
    The situation with the RH bill is the Filipino, led by the Church, putting his fingers in his ears and singing loudly "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU~."
    Ignorance is a powerful thing. It is the weapon the church itself yields.
    Careful, author. What you regard as sarcasm, the others regard as their truth.

    • Super agree ako dito.. Kaso di naisip ng author un eh.. Yung mga iba nman nagmamagaling na sarcasm lng daw eh obvious nman feeling nila ang tatalino nila. Nandun na tyo sa point na sarcasm nga to. Eh ang tanong effective ba? Kung titignan ratio ng negative comments isang malaki "HINDI" ang sagot

        • That's why I stressed that some people should check out Dustin's other posts. I don't think it was written for everybody. If he intended to write this article for everyone then the FF site wouldn't be the most appropriate site to do that, IMO. And I guess that's just his writing style. Most of them are either tagged as "humor" or "fiction".

  44. Hahaha, I can see different voices believeing and disbelieveing this article. I know this is sarcasm, but sarcasm or not, it really made its rep of being talked and argued about by both rational and irrational people.

  45. Im neither pro nor anti..but ill point some loopholes in your argument.
    I disagree with you limiting the purpose of women…read Simone De Beauviour's "The Second Sex", you man!
    I disagree with you saying that Mary learned how to concieve w/o sex…read you Bible again,she did not learned it instead she had no choice because she was appointed, hypocrite catholic!
    I disagree with you using dinosaurs…it was a bad metaphor…read you grade school textbook, moron!
    I disagree with you when saying that low population is bad for economy and using the 3 countries as examples, please review you Asian History by Zaide and whatever World history book you have, and do supplement it with any book on sociopolitical and economic thought, you narrow minded!
    I disagree, in fact, im in a big shit when you said baby can be sold, FUCK YOU! its like saying you go sell your body for sex, its an asset by the way! again, pathetic hypocrite catholic!
    I disagree with your statement on abortion, your jumping into conclusion and speculations, it's more than that dude…im not discussing this further.
    I disagree with you saying these catholic priest are always right, then hale be to these fathers, pray for our sinful souls and also their sinful souls, judgmental minds and hypocrite persona. God have mercy on these priest for they do not know what they are doing. Read you Bible, you pathetic catholic author of this article, the Bible said, there is no righteous, no not one! and review your Mr.Webster for the meaning of "NO".

  46. Sa author nitong article na to… Bakit di mo gawing direct to the point para maintindihan ng mga bobong katulad mo? Malamang natatakot ka. Kaso sa ginawa mo lalo lang naguluhan mga bobo sau. Eh malamang 50% mahigit ng mga pilipino bobo at isa ka na dun. May sarcasm ka pang nalalaman eh pano kung maniwala mga kauri mong bobo sau? Edi lalong dumami anti RH Bill. Meron nman din bobong di naniniwala sau kaso di nila alam na sarcasm lang sinulat mo kaya ok lng kasI tingin din nila sau bobo ahahaha. Saka pano kung foreigner makabasa nito? Pinasama mo pa image ng mga pilipino putang ina mong bobo ka!

    • teka tanga, baka sarcastic ka lang din? pero hinde eh, mukang tanga ka nga talaga hahahahah

    • bagay sa'yo ang pen name mo, Tanga 🙂

      you could search the meaning of SARCASM in dictionary.com, because obviously, you are lacking some vocabulary in your head 🙂

  47. kasi nabasa namin yung Bill, hindi kami pari o sunudsunuran. at may sarili kaming desisyon <3

  49. I honestly don't know what's funnier, this blog, or the people who have to comment and say how wrong the blog author's arguments are…

    Once again, another reason why we need the RH Bill… xD

  50. Sa mga nagmamagaling dyan na alam nila na sarcasm to, Hello! Obvious na obvious! Di niyo kailangan ulit ulitin. Feeling nyo ang tatalino niyo porket na gets niyo?

« Older Comments Newer Comments »

Comments are closed.

SUBSCRIBE

Stay Updated

Subscribe now

REPORT

Secularism Violations

Report here

one who forms opinions on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief; one who doubts or denies religious dogma

Contact us at [email protected]

© 2021 Filipino Freethinkers. All rights reserved.

Menu

Blog

Featured Articles