One of the primary objectives of this blog is to encourage people to express what’s on their mind when it comes to socially relevant and often controversial news and current events. But of course before such exchange of ideas can start, a good writer has to open up the topic with a well-written intro on the issue. Hopefully, these series of articles aimed at developing a responsible writer will help everyone come up with their own future posts.
So we begin with lesson one. After you’ve decided on a good topic that piques your interest (and hopefully everyone else’s), you have to decide on the tone. Most social commentaries fall in either one or a combination of any of these three...
Apparently, it's gotten so hot that Manila experienced its two highest temperatures for this year. Last week. Grab a cold drink, and welcome to this week's news updates!
With out any form of leverage, we are just victims. Power, real power, comes from the ability to compel others against their will. A simple lesson on how to look at problems and find the solution.
Europe may be in trouble due to Iceland's recent volcanic eruptions, but that hasn't stopped the Pope from making a trip to Malta to meet the sex abuse victims, or Obama from announcing where NASA just might be focusing its next space exploration missions.
With the recent embarrasment brought about by one of our articles, I sometimes wish that the Filipino Freethinkers had a formal organizational and editorial structure where we could actually sanction erring members and take down their articles. But the FF is not a formal organization, and the fact that most of our readers – and critics – believe otherwise does not change this.
Sometimes – actually oftentimes – we can get pretty sloppy and careless in our use of words.
Take the use of the words “proof” and “evidence”. Proof and evidence, like speed and velocity, or theory and guess, have colloquial definitions that often lead to confusion. In order to smooth the progress of communication and avoid misunderstanding, these words have been given technical definitions in science and philosophy...For example, we prove a mathematical theorem instead of “finding evidences” for its truth, while we accumulate the evidence for a particular scientific theory but we never “prove” a theory.
What’s the difference? The distinction is best illustrated by examples.
A blind summa cum laude graduate, a Barbie Doll for heathens, and Dawkin's Shaft impersonation (well, sorta). These and more weekly news updates available over at the full article!
"Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law."