REPORT Secularism Violations
Humor

Why the RH Bill is bad: The Real Truth behind the Supposed Truth about the RH Bill

Dustin Celestino
Dustin Celestino

I used to support the RH Bill. I no longer do. By the end of this document, neither would you. I have not supported the RH Bill since I attended a lecture in Megamall about the truth behind it. That lecture truly enlightened me. My only hope is that this holy light of enlightenment passes through your monitor screen, into your optical nerves, and into your heart so it can touch your soul (because the soul is in the heart). My intent here is not to antagonize Pro-RH people, but to enlighten – so listen up, you narrow-minded morons. Open your minds to the real truth…

The RH Bill will put Filipinos at risk of extinction, because, at its very core, the RH Bill is an extension of a secret, global conspiracy – a western attempt – to implement principles of eugenics on unsuspecting, inferior populations in order to exclude them from the human evolutionary process, at the end of which would, at the apex, summon forth THE MASTER RACE. Anyone who failed to see this after the lecture is ignorant. I advise him or her to do his or her research, better yet, do some soul-searching to discover the real truth, because the truth is in our hearts, we just have to listen to it.

Initially, my layman’s interpretation of the RH Bill led me to think that it was just a bill meant to help educate the uninformed about ways to prevent them from fornicating their way to a very bad financial situation. My ignorant mind devised 10 simple points as to why the RH Bill was right.

I thought:

1. The minimum wage – the lowest an employer can pay an employee – of a non-agricultural Filipino worker is P404.

2. If there were 20 working days in a month (because most people don’t work on the weekend), the average minimum-wage-earning Filipino would earn around P8,000 a month.

3. Let’s call that person, Joey. If Joey, like other human beings, ate food on a regular basis, he will spend around P70/day on food (and that’s a very, very conservative assumption). There are 30 days in a month, so I guess, that would amount to P2,100 a month.

4. But if Joey had a wife that he loved, he might want to feed her too. Feeding her would cost another P2,100 a month.

5. P8,000 – P4,200 = P3,800

6. If Joey and his wife rented a home, or used electricity and bathed from time to time, the amount left from Joey’s salary would be significantly reduced. Let’s say their utility bills and rent amounted to P1800.

7. P3,800 – P1800 = P2,000

8. P2,000 is a lot of money, but I don’t think Joey and his wife should have more than 3 children, right? I mean, I don’t have children, but just by looking at one, I can safely assume that they cost more than P1,000/month. Babies need milk, diapers, toys, immunity injections, baby medicine…

9. From this I deduced that babies cost money. If babies cost money, I theorized that having more babies would cost more money. And from this data, I observed that a person who spent a lot of money on children, but didn’t earn a lot of money, would soon be broke and unable to provide for both himself and his children. Another word for this broke situation is poverty.

10. I theorized that a person can avoid being poor by making less babies. So, I thought that steps should be taken to inform people about this very little known fact. I also thought that the government should make contraceptives accessible so that people who don’t earn a lot can properly manage the little resources that they have. That’s why I supported the RH Bill.

But now I know that I was wrong. And here are some of the reasons why I know that. By the way, before I continue, I must say that this is the truth, guys. In fact, it’s more than the truth. It’s the Catholic truth, which means that it’s truer and more true than the regular truth.

I know that the issue of the RH Bill is not a religious issue, but make sure you pay attention if you want your soul to be saved. Here are some of the things I learned from the lecture I learned:

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that the Philippines is overpopulated.”

I agree. I, myself, have observed that the Philippine is NOT overpopulated. In fact, if you use your common sense and think about it, you will realize a few things:

1. We are not overpopulated! Look at the mountains, the jungles, the caves and the ocean floor. There are no people there!

2. If we were really overpopulated, we would have trouble travelling. But if you go to EDSA, there’s no traffic. When you ride the MRT, it’s not packed with people.

3. Students in public schools are well educated because the teacher to student ratio is very low. In fact, because of our low population the government can basically guarantee that all public school students are provided books, notebooks and other school supplies.

 

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that contraceptives are good for mankind and women.”

1. I agree, the RH Bill is not good for women because it might draw a woman away from her one, true, universal purpose – the uninterrupted production of healthy babies.

2. Furthermore, the role of women in society and the universe is to make babies. That’s why God made women. That’s their sole purpose in life. They’re not good for anything else. Ever wonder why there are no women in the clergy? Because they’re not good enough.

3. Contraceptives would allow women to enjoy the benefits of physical intimacy while maintaining a successful and productive career, if she so chooses. That is so wrong. Only men should be able to enjoy that privilege.

4. Women should get pregnant every single time they have sex and only immoral women enjoy sex without the possibility of conception. In fact, a better alternative would be for women, in general, to follow the example made by Mother Mary – to learn how to conceive without having sex.

 

 

“The RH bill will put Filipinos at risk of extinction!”

1. I agree. If we pass the RH bill, we will become extinct, like dinosaurs. The dinosaurs are all dead. If we don’t want to be extinct, we should not pass the RH Bill. I mean, do you really want to be a dinosaur?

2. In my opinion, it wouldn’t even be far-fetched to speculate that the most probable reason the dinosaurs became extinct was because they used contraceptives.

3. Population decline is just bad for nations. Just look at the countries which have a declining population – Italy, Japan and Singapore. They’re in such a bad shape. The Philippines obviously has a better economy and has a higher literacy rate than these countries. In fact, many Italians, Japanese, and Singaporeans go to the Philippines for work. That only goes to show that a decline in population is bad for the economy.

 

 

“Our population is our biggest asset!”

1.  In my opinion, people should make as many babies as they can because the population is not a problem. In fact, the more babies a person has, the more assets he has. Forget real estate properties, stock investments, or Jollibee franchises. The real secret to increased wealth is babies.

2. If you have 15 babies, you’re practically wealthy because babies are assets:

2.1 If you need money, you can sell them.

2.2 If you can keep them alive until they can walk, they can one day beg for money in the streets – they’re going to have to anyway because there’s no way in hell you’ll be able to provide for all of them on your own.

3. If ever a person is not able to feed the 15 babies he made, it’s the governments fault, because it’s the governments sole responsibility to make sure that every Filipino baby is fed.

4. The best way a person can contribute to his country is to contribute to its population.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that reproductive education and contraceptives will effectively reduce cases of abortion.”

1. Reproductive/contraceptive education will have no effect on the number of abortion cases. In my opinion, these abortion cases will not lessen because women will continue to have abortions regardless of whether they are pregnant or not.

2. Abortions cannot be prevented. It’s just something that women naturally do. Like shopping, for example.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it will make people participate in extra-marital and pre-marital sex.”

1. By approving the RH Bill, we as a nation, are practically encouraging our people to engage in immoral activities.

2. We must protect our moral values and reject the RH Bill. Because, currently, not a single Filipino engages in pre-marital sex or extra-marital sex. As soon as this bill is approved, Filipino people will run the streets naked and start a national orgy!

3. The root cause of extra-marital and pre-marital sex is one’s exposure to contraceptives. There is just something in contraceptives that people find very arousing.

4. In Western countries, men lure strange women into bed by showing them condoms.

5. If we ban condoms, absolutely no one would engage in pre-marital or extra-marital sex.

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that parents don’t teach their children about sex.”

1. The truth is that parents talk to their children about sex all the time. It’s so not awkward. The dad usually tells his children how he takes off all his clothes, does a sexy Tiger growl and makes sweet, sweet music with their mother’s body.

2. Also, a father usually advises his daughter that if she’s going to have sex with her boyfriend, she should use a condom. Sometimes the father even drives the daughter to the boyfriend’s house and waits for the couple to finish.

3. Filipino daughters don’t have sex without the father’s permission. Unwanted pregnancies or teen pregnancies never happen to Filipino girls. That’s why we do not need the RH Bill.

 

“The RH Bill is a conspiracy.”

1. It’s lies, all lies!

 

“The RH Bill is wrong because the priest said so, and priests are never wrong.”

The biggest reason why we should not pass the RH Bill is because the priests told us that we shouldn’t. As anyone should know, priests, men of the clergy, should be the authority on sexual and reproductive matters because they have the most knowledge and experience with sex and reproduction. They are true sexperts – legendary masters of erotic affairs. If you are a real Catholic, you would do everything they say, because they’re always right.

Related content

2865 comments

  2. Those people trying to show off or nagmamagaling by putting others down doesn't really help. Come on the author is trying to send a very good message here. We can actually deliver what it is that we want to say in a good way. Instead of trying to help each other here we are rather putting our own fellowmen down. Looking at the bigger picture, no wonder our nation is in real chaos. #justsayin

  3. wag kayo maghanap sa internet ng pang kontra dito para maging astig at intelligent ang comments niyo.

  4. DI ko makapigilang matawa sa mga comment dito!!!
    Hahaha…Cant they see the real LOGIC of THIS ARTICLE???

    THIS IS KABALIKTARAN or REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY GUYS!!!!

    He means the OTHER WAY AROUND….
    DOOOOMMMMEDDDDDD………hahaha…
    the best proRH bill for me..

  5. Sumakit ulo ko sa mga hindi nakagets ng article na to. Nakakabwiset na nakakairita na ewan. Syet. /wrist

  7. OK. THIS IS AMAZINGLY FUNNY AND SARCASTIC. APPARENTLY THERE ARE STUPID FILIPINOS ON HERE WHO DIDN'T GET THAT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A JOKE.

    SARCASTIC NGA E. SATIRE. SARCASM. LOOK IT UP IN THE DICTIONARY DIMWITS! (Umiinit talaga dugo ko)

    Ok. tagalugin ko. SA MGA HINDI NAKAINTINDI SA ARTICLE NA TOH. ANG TANGA NIYO. HINDI NGA SERYOSO ANG WRITER. JOKE LANG. ALAM NIYO BA YUNG JOKE? SIGURO NAMAN ALAM NIYO YUNG MEANING NG JOKE?

    KUNG PWEDE LANG PATAYIN YUNG MGA TANGA SA PILIPINAS.

    I am hyperventilating as I type this.

    • Find my comment on not preaching to these "dimwits" about sarcasm. (I'd give you the permalink, pero hindi siya bumubukas agad sa message ko. Okay lang, nasa second page lang naman e.) See, the more you get affected, the more you will be disappointed because the fact that they did not see sarcasm would mean they would most likely not get your outburst anyway. So cool it. Your outburst is helpful, maybe, but unoriginal. And in this case you wouldn't want to be unoriginal because simply stated, it's irritating.

    • Minsan tatanungin mo na lang, sino ba ang mas tanga? Yung pinanganak na tanga o yung "matalino" na alam na ngang incurable yung katangahan pero pipilitin paring magmarunong?

    • i believe this is overreacting hahaha, we understand sarcasm and it's a good laugh that some people don't. but this comment is just uncalled for. nakakatawa ka lang lalo

  9. please. being a trash-mouth does not show how great you are. you can freely express your opinions without it, i believe. pwde mo namang tulungan ung tao na intindihin kung anuman ang dapat na ibig sabihin ng artikulong ito. baka sa dami ng mura na nilalagay mo un na lang ang nakikita niya at naiisip niya.. kaya ata pati ung iba nakikisali na rin.

    • I agree with you lala. Those people trying to show off or nagmamagaling by putting others down doesn't really help. Come on the author is trying to send a very good message here. Instead of trying to help each other here we are rather putting our own fellowmen down. Looking at the bigger picture, no wonder our nation is in real chaos. #justsayin

  11. Damn your sharp sarcasm! I really like it (sincerely and not sarcastically)! If anyone from the clergy reads this, he will surely recommend your excommunication. But who cares anyway? I myself would rather be branded as a heretic rather than become sheep to a blind shepherd. My allegiance is to God and not the the people who pretend to uphold his will. I have always respected the Catholic Church despite our differences in beliefs and ideals. However, it might just run out if they continue to meddle with affairs of the state.

    P.S. To those who did not detect the sarcastic tone of the writer, I suggest you attend a workshop in creative writing. That way you won't look like a bunch of idiots who do not comprehend this article. Sarcasm is a very effective form of humor and literary device. To those who can't stomach it, go ahead and read fairy tales instead.

    • Fairy tales also contain hidden nuggets of information very like sarcasm, if you didn't know.

      Aside from that very irrelevant comment of mine above, good post. "My allegiance is to God and not the the people who pretend to uphold his will." – proof that not all believers are non-freethinkers.

  13. it's dripping with sarcasm, and dark humor and I love it! =) An excellent PRO RH Bill piece. =)

  14. Wow everybody's being so serious about an article written in an objective, yet not so serious, article. Stop posting serious comments and eat my tits!

    • kinda low for someone who have no sense of humor and doesn't even know what sarcasm is! come on guys! you're RH Bill supporters, you're supposed to use your brains!

      • Porket hindi siya natuwa ibig sabihin hindi siya suporta, ganun ba gusto mong iparating? I didn't know "using our brains" is equivalent to "using our sense of humor".

        • uhm what part of my comment did i mention him being anti-RH Bill? and yes my friend, you do use your head when you use your sense of humor. would you be able to understand a joke if you didn't? but i wasn't even referring to his sense of humor when i said "use your brains". i was suggesting to everyone to think and analyze first before making a comment like the other comment he made. pero i apologize for being such an ass. many of us here are RH Bill supporters so i shouldn't really be bashing anyone. sorry Eloy. peace guys!

          • That's because you attacked his comment on the article being "low". Well, so what if it is low, as long as it works, right? Yun naman yung punto niya eh. Being low does not automatically mean the article sucks.

            Shalom.

          • that's because his comments are irritating. he's trying so hard to sound better than anybody else here, when in fact he ended up sounding like a moron. parang naging defensive na lang, masabi lang nagiisip sya, masabi lang na kunwari pinaglalaruan nya lang mga nagcomments sa kanya at nagfafake lang sya. that's just pathetic for me. that put me off. pero again, i shouldn't have commented like that. shalom!

        • what better way to address something so ridiculously obvious? the mockery is kinda low, yes, but for many it works much brilliantly than sounding so intellectual. just my 2 cents. sorry again for being an ass. peace bro!

  16. very nice AUTHOR, na-test mo kung gaano kabababaw at kahihina ang mga kukute ng mga Pilipino, no wonder, the average IQ Filipinos registered in World IQ Survey is just 110.

  17. They see me trollin'. They hatin'. Patrollin them posts coz I'm still postin' dirteh m/ Yeah uh-huh (with exaggerated sex sounds) you know how it is!

  18. UR POST has created so many negative reactions from both parties..
    only one thing's for sure BRO,

    God wouldn't ever allow something to happen that isn't according to His great plan in our lives..

  20. For those geniuses who do NOT understand the whole point of this article, try to get a clue. Sarcasm was dripping so much I had to wipe my laptop screen from the flood of sarcasm that came through… well on top of tears of laughter while reading the article AND the comments. Whoa! Who would have thought people will take this literally. Or maybe it’s a conspiracy to make the author believe they didn’t understand but in fact did, and the joke’s on the author. *gasp*

  21. "RH bill provides free contraceptives to alleviate poverty.
    I love free stuff, I mean who doesn't? When the bill is implemented, I'll go out and get all the contraceptive I can carry and sell them for a profit. Ka-ching! My financial problems that stems from decade-long mismanagement of finances is now solved! Hooray!"

    Read more at http://balitangsibuyas.edicypages.com/news/rh-bil…

  22. One moment you're reading this article and you think, "Hey! This country may not be doomed after all! Pinoys are smart people!"

    That is until you read these comments. How could someone who uses the internet not recognize a satire when it's there?

    • I keep saying that the Internet is not a very good venue for sarcasm. Look up my previous post somewhere here, which is unfortunately drowned in a sea of stupid comments.

    • the internet actually diminishes the wit. this should be read out loud, like a stand-up comedian would haha.

    • well, it couldn't be helped. the internet is not a very good way for sarcasm. i also thought that i wasted my time reading the whole article then i realized, "ohh, so the writer is being sarcastic in the article." lol.

  23. OKAY, STOP TELLING PEOPLE IT'S SATIRE. THOSE OF US WHO GOT IT GOT IT THE FIRST TIME. LET THEM WHO THINK OTHERWISE WALLOW IN THEIR IGNORANCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF READING THE COMMENTS SECTION ANYTIME. Kung sa tingin niyo nakakatalino yung pagpost niyo ng "satire to tanga" bawat minuto, well, nagkakamali kayo. Parehas lang kayong nakakabobo ng mga hindi marunong umunawa ng sarcasm.

  24. GUYS, wag tayong pahalatang tanga, ha? nakakahiya kayo eh.

    this article was meant to be a satire. it's sarcastic.

  25. One moment you're reading this article and you think, "Hey! This country may not be doomed after all!"

    …and then you see the comments. It's called a satire, my fellow men.

  28. It's really funny to watch people arguing on the comments section. Have a sense of humor, guys! Don't just skim the article. READ IT.

  31. :)) napakasarcastic nung article! =))))) nakakatuwa basahin yung mga comments nung mga taong di nakagets. 😛 sus, dead giveaway na nga yung sinabi na hindi traffic sa EDSA at hindi puno ng tao yung MRT. i suggest na sana hindi lang yung mismong literal na nakasulat yung sinusubukang intindihin ng tao. sana makuha nila yung message ng article na ito. 😀

  32. hahaha kelan hindi naging trapik sa edsa? at kelan hndi naging masikip sa mrt?? 1 am ka ba lumalabas? at kelan naging mababa ang 1:60 na ratio ng student to teacher? at bakit nasa manila ka? tira ka sa mountains jungle at ocean floor

  33. PLEASE OPEN MY MIND. Debate anyone? 🙂

    1. I hate it when Anti RH Bill Guys refer Pro RH Bill Guys as ANTI LIFE and self proclaim themselves PRO Life.

    my thing: RH Bill wouldn't enforce anyone to use condom against their will. RH Bill just wants us to have a choice. If you want a big family then so be it. We are not killing anyone, we are actually preventing someone from getting killed because of malnutrition, poor health among others. Again don't blame everything to the government (you'd say it's their job to provide health care services etc. etc. etc.) prolly it's that you are not well-educated about family planning (how many children you can support)

    2. We should invest on producing more jobs for the poor so that they can support their family.

    my thing: admit it, even if our government open jobs such as metro-aids, janitors, clerk (i'm not against these jobs) we wouldn't make that unemployment rate to go 0% since more students are graduating from HS and College.

    3. We are not overpopulated.

    Bullshit. We are.

    3.1 Yes. We aren't overpopulated. The Population is just concentrated in the Metro.

    Yes on concentration. again Not Overpopulated = Bullshit. You can't force those people to go away from the Metro. e.g. those relocated squatters from anywhere refuse any kind of help from the government moving them to another place. they'd prefer on where they are.

    4. On Former Mayor Atienza's point that people who will not practice contraception use stand to be jailed from one to six months. <a href="http://(http://ph.news.yahoo.com/rh-bill-worse-martial-law-says-former-mayor-005700277.html)” target=”_blank”>(http://ph.news.yahoo.com/rh-bill-worse-martial-law-says-former-mayor-005700277.html)

    Another bullshit, those only who disobeys certain provisions will be jailed. example: a health worker who will deny anyone who wants to access the free contraceptives even if the contraceptives are available. There is even a provision in the bill that in case it is against the philosophy or religion of any health worker to provide contraception, he/she may refer a person to another health worker.

    5. Atienza's claim that RH bill is worse than Martial Law. (refer to previous link)

    Probably Not. I don't know what it's like during Martial law. But I now know why Manila would prefer Alfredo Lim than Lito Atienza. lolz.

    Debate ON. Please let this be informative 🙂

    • abolish the 1987 constitution to create MORE jobs. kasi ang mga oligarch lang talaga ang nakinabang sa people power. I don't want to debate. I want the greater good that's why support RH bill

    • 1. The RH bill encourages people to have at most 2 children. Thats synonymous to having a campaign to limit kids to 2. At the rate of our modern world is going, with develop countries having to give incentives for their people to produce off-springs, I think this is a wrong move. Let those who want to have kids, have kids. I'm the 5th of 6 siblings. Thank God this thinking was not prevalent during my mom's time. And as a 5th child, I know I am contributing well to the Philippines.

      2. By producing more jobs, I don't think its limited to blue collar jobs my friend. Inviting foreign investors, giving good incentives for start up businesses, promoting tourism.. in those lines.

      3. You cannot force these people to go back to their towns the same way you can't force people to stop having sex. Force is not the word, but having more jobs in their original localities, would make them want less want to go to Manila.

      People, we are underpopulated. Don't we always hear that we don't have enough doctors and teachers to man the hospitals and schools. Yes, the pay abroad is higher, and its all good .. but if there were MORE doctors and teachers, for sure there'd still be those who'd decide to stay and serve the country.

      I am pro Choice, pro-Contraceptives, pro-Life, but I am ANTI-RH bill for the simple premise that our taxes should go elsewhere, and not merely to condoms. True that the RH bill is more than just the free contraceptives, its also about pre-natal care. Then why not do a Health Care bill instead, encompassing the needs of a Filipino, whether rich or poor, whether pregnant or not 😉

      • 1. OMG, it encourages? maybe. but it isn't included in the RH Bill as far as I am concerned. And what's wrong with promoting families to only have two children. again, in the end it's the family's choice whether they would have 5or6 or just 2. Those develop countries you are saying, i.e. Japan, Canada, they give incentives because….hmm just look at what the state of their population. and If you're gonna say that we'll end up like them when we passed RH Bill, maybe in around 3 centuries I guess. 😛 And those developing countries, India for example, they have this bill wherein they will be giving couples free honeymoon but they have to delay having children.

        2. Blue Collar jobs hm. remind me of How Gloria Arroyo "solved" the high unemployment rate in the Philippines. :)) Foreign Investors? well, they would choose i.e. Vietnam (P 2,103/month min. wage), Indonesia (P 7080/month), Thailand (P 288/day). I'm just saying that these capitalist investors would rather choose a place where there is a low pay and high productivity. (I have a very good hunch that every corporations would have their businesses established at Vietnam) btw, current min wage of Phils. P404/day. Promoting Tourism, we are dead behind all the asian countries so we really need to catch up on that. Starting businesses up would be a good thing, unless of course SM won't have a version of your business 😛

        3. Again with the jobs. RH Bill won't force one to stop having sex. LOLz.

        4. Elaborate on your underpopulation? how would you say that we are overpopulated? Cause again, I find it bullshit that we aren't overpopulated. 94 mil people in 300k sq km. of land? It's not about the number of doctors, teachers, engineers in the country, we have a lot of graduates here and there it's that they are serving lots of people. teachers serving 51 students on three shifts for how much? engineers serving a lot of people with overpriced low-quality materials for how much? Doctors risking their lives going to the outskirts of country for how much?

        Yes there are a lot of important bills above this. But let's see, if we continue to grow (in number), would it still be healthy for us? Health care bill sounds cool but is it possible? (i.e, Universal Healthcare Bill in the US is such a long and big debate, paano pa kaya satin?)

        salamat sa insights.

  34. lahat gusto maging star uh… wala na akong nakita sa mga reply kundi puro tanga, bobo, tangina etc.. breeding niyo ang bababa! tumigil na nga kayo sa kaka away dahil wala namang mananalo sainyo!

  35. The only reason you don't like this post is that you didn't read it through and completely missed the point.

  36. The RH Bill is wrong because it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Check out THe 1987 Constitution, Article 2, Section 12.

  37. I love how many people skimmed over the article and wrote angry comments trying to "argue" with the author. Maybe you shouldn't take everything at face value? *ahem CBCP teachings* Based on this article alone, I'd say people need to work on their reading comprehension.

    See this is the problem in the country— people listen to some of the facts from a "reliable" source and make their decisions based on these. And of course the common Filipino is going to listen to the Church (otherwise you're doomed to hell or something like that right CBCP?)

    If there's any party that needs to be responsible it should be the Church. It needs to allow its believers to make the right decisions but give them the freedom to decide for themselves what is right. After all, if the Church educated its people right, there'd be no problem with the RH Bill..

    • nah, people were just bored so they decided to act like fools. can't possibly be true. i mean..who wouldn't get the sarcasm in this article. right?
      here's to hoping that you're the one who's taking everything at face value.

      ps agree with that last line 😉

  38. they've included it, (coming from a public HS, tinuro yun nung 3rd year sa literature subject namin)

    hindi lang kasi sila nakikinig sa english teacher nila kaya ganun, kung ano ano ang inaatupag hahaha

  41. panay english pa ang mga hindot, hindi naman pala naintindihan na nagpapaka-SARCASTIC ang author. Go Pinoy Genius! Dapat sa inyo mag-apply sa NASA!

  42. where do we use sarcasm? buti nga may internet! haha kung sa mass media to, outrage na ang buong pinas!

  43. ohhh peeps read on and understand the message very well before you pinch in your comments….its indeed a wake up call dude….go for RH BILL….
    try to get the message…the author say soooo with humor ..read between the lines..:)

  44. hindi naman sa pagiging elitist pero this article just segregated the intellectuals from mediocrity 🙂

  45. The fact that people say this article is stupid shows how much we need this bill to prevent idiots like the people who believe this article is REAL from both spawning and BEING spawned. Can't you see that this is a sarcastic article? The mere fact that you were not able to pick that up shows how we need more public schools to create geniuses like you. I hope you detected the sarcasm there. Heck, if the RH bill were implemented as early as the 70's we'd probably have better-educated people by now thanks to wise choices made by responsible and disciplined parents. To everyone who took this article seriously… C'mon. Seriously?

  46. Sige, let's point out the loopholes ha…. eh isang malaking loophole yang kehaba haba mong sinulat!

  49. i'm with you man..but come on.

    pucha seryoso ka? bebenta mo mga bata? come on man.

    and seriously, you believe that we'd get extinct because of the rh bill?

    i dunno where you get your info man but i think you need to reconsider what you're saying. and your way of thinking. it's messed up. instead of getting people to agree with you, you're actually pushing people away. so if i were you, i'd read up and replace this stupid article with something that actually would make sense and would actually be beneficial to the rh bill.

« Older Comments Newer Comments »

Comments are closed.

SUBSCRIBE

Stay Updated

Subscribe now

REPORT

Secularism Violations

Report here

one who forms opinions on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief; one who doubts or denies religious dogma

Contact us at [email protected]

© 2021 Filipino Freethinkers. All rights reserved.

Menu

Blog

Featured Articles