Why the RH Bill is bad: The Real Truth behind the Supposed Truth about the RH Bill

1. I'm sorry but you threw me off right when you posted comments on what a woman should be as part of the society that she lives in. RE: that her only purpose is to bear a child and that she is not good on anything else other than that. First of, conceiving another human in your womb for 9 months is a very humbling yet powerful experience to any type of woman. So please do not have the audacity to make it sound that we are only good for nothing. Secondly, a woman just like a man should have the rights to decide what and what not to do with their body. Afterall, WE are the ones who have to bear the child for 9 months, suffer from back pains, mood swings, stretch marks, post partum depression, and not to mention the pain and a 50/50 chance that we might die from giving birth. You should think about that first before making up all these nonsense allegations because after all, you yourself came from a woman. BTW had "Joey" found a woman who is motivated enough to look for a job that would help him with his financial difficulties and not just open her legs and wait for him to get paid, then maybe they will be on a much better place.

   • To New_Age_Chick05: you presented your (female's perspective) side very well. Nobody is arguing against you or your views, least of all the author of the satire you read. He simply presented his views in a reverse, humorous way, to emphasize how silly, illogical and senseless the arguments of those blindly opposing the bill are. Please read the article again cause the author is definitely on your side…

2. It's just sad that some people don't get (or even recognize) a good satire when they see one. My advice : trash and foil the RH bill so that we can all happily procreate. Fill your house to the rafters with children. ====> AND BLAME THE GOVERNMENT FOR YOUR POVERTY. The corruption of some unscrupulous government officials notwithstanding, the governent (ehem ehem Mr. President) should really step in and put an end to this debate just because the clergy does not want the bill. I mean come on.

3. It's just sad that some people don't get (or even recognize) a good satire when they see one. My advice : trash and foil the RH bill so that we can all happily procreate. Fill your house to the rafters with children. ====> AND BLAME THE GOVERNMENT FOR YOUR POVERTY. The corruption of some unscrupulous government officials notwithstanding, the governent (ehem ehem Mr. President) should really step in and put an end to this debate just because the clergy does not want the bill. I mean come on.

   WHAT WE NEED IS LAICISM, NOT JUST SECULARISM. It's not enough that the affairs of the church be separated from the government, but the church SHOULD subscribe to the mandates of the government. After all, WE ARE NOT IN A STATE OF ANARCHY HERE!. Again, I might be wrong. There might be someone who would like to challenge my opinion. I don't get the hate that goes on among the pro and anti-RH supporters.

   Enough with the callousness, people from the clergy. We need to be informed of our reproductive health options. And dont even get me started with the abortifacents arguments. Isa pa tong mga lecheng media na although the claim that they are neutral and just merely airing the sentiments of both sides, halatang halata naman ang mga biases ninyo. Isa pang dapat i-slam itong wala namang alam na si Pacquiao at ang nanay nyang mukang tahong na nag-iingay sa congress. Nakalog na ng boxing yang utak mo, Mr. Representative. Wag ka nang umapela. P.S. Kudos sa ghostwriter at sa researcher mo ng mga privilege speeches mo sa plenary. Sweldohan mo yan ng maigi, kasi magaling at saksakan ng resourceful.

   Naubusan na ako ng sasabihin. Balik na lang ako sa pagssex. Safely, of course.

4. Genius…Good thing I read til the end. I almost didn’t finish it myself. I thought it was just some naive kid just wanting to show off their writing skills in a case of extreme textbook narcissism. Good job sir!

   But I acknowledge the possibility of a hidden agenda by the West, who is the forerunner in the promotion of a global formulation of legislation aimed towards population control in the guise of the Millennium Development Goals and other such Western-stimulated-and/or-initiated global initiatives. But that is another story.

   • Wag ka na Wacky. HAHA! Hidden agenda ka dyan. Kung ang Westerners ang masusunod, gugustuhin nila na magparami na lang tayo ng magparami para madami silang maexploit as far as labor is concerned. Sila din kaya, no. Bakit kaya ang mura ng condoms sa US? Kung gusto ng America na maging anti-RH dapat BUWISAN NILA ANG CONDOMS. Or better yet, bakit para ka lang bibili ng bagong iPod kung magpapaabort ka? Ganun lang sya ka-mura. Para hindi ka na bili ng bili.

5. I love this IRONIC article!!!

   Only a moron will have these kind of views but if it's written in IRONY then it means that this person is making us think otherwise that there's really no argument to oppose the RH bill.

   :)))

6. I was seriously afraid that my mom would hear me laughing when I got to the dinosaurs part x))

7. There are few strong points to this topic but it doesn't really mean it speaks for all the people out there. And yeah it's basically religious stuff. I mean what if you're not a Catholic? I mean we're given Free WIll by God, if that's the case we could choose whatever path we want as long as we want to either it's the good one or bad one. We can't decide what's best for others, it's their right to do what they want. Since this is a democratic country, the church should understand their role that they themselves are not above the law. Since we're all rational beings, it's understandable that each of us differ in perspective, we can't make everyone like what we all like right? If this is the REAL TRUTH as it said in the topic, why would the government sell out their own people?

8. excuse me sir but i think you're the narrow-minded moron… have you ever been to a public school lately??? didn't you know that some public schools have three time shifts in a day because they are overpopulated??? I pity your wife because you only think of her as a machine for making babies…

9. Thanks for the good laugh. 🙂
   The battle to pass the RH bill has a long way to go…
   National orgy – that’s a good one. Can’t stop laughing.

   A lot of people allow themselves to be misinformed. That makes the battle tougher. People should be more critical of the information that they receive.

10. I dont know why this site wouldnt post my comment. I guess they just hate pro rh-bill comments.

11. This article is just too stupid. And too paranoid. Whoever wrote this should have himself checked.. For his own sake and for everyone else around him. The RH bill is PRO-CHOICE. Choice; something God gave us. Fuck the priests who think they're right cause they're not and are actually just making things more complicated. There's a good reason why the state should be separated from the church. Whatever happens, the church is still under the government so just suck it up. The RH bill does not prevent lives from happening, it actually SAVES them. From poverty and every other kind of abuse in the future.

    At the end of the day, the pope agreed to it already so there's no point in arguing. Even if god wouldn't want condoms, he wouldn't like poverty and overpopulation more. Think about it dimwits.

    • Whoever wrote this should have himself checked.. IKAW ANG Mag pacheck up. Utol kaba ba ni Rashine Palma?

      PRO RH bill yung author. He presented his ideas thru a satire. Read again. Better yet, read the comments. You have joined the dozens na hindi nakuha ang point.

      Tanga!

12. a very well written and comprehensive article… at first i was raising my eyebrow and then i continued reading and i was fascinated how the fact are laid out… two thumbs up to you sir… Informative Thorough and Direct 🙂

13. 2. If you have 15 babies, you’re practically wealthy because babies are assets:

    2.1 If you need money, you can sell them.

    Hey.. are u sure of this??

    • Why, did the author almost convinced you?

      Sarcasm to tsong.

14. As the tv commercial goes – "they just keep coming and coming and coming…". Or, an old song comes to mind – 'fools rush in'.:p

15. Haha. Thanks for the laugh. Twas an interesting satirical essay of the sort.

16. Some misconceptions about the RH bill:
    – why give out free contraceptives when these are already being sold openly?
    – why give the taxes I pay to horny guys when the money can be put to better use?
    – curbing overpopulation will not eradicate poverty!

    The RH bill is supposed to address the needs of the poor, marginalized members of our country- those who barely eat 3 times a day (rice with salt or soup is by no means a decent meal). The bill will not target people who can afford to but their own computers or go to shops so they can comment here. The subject of this bill are the parents of the street children and the like.

    The taxes I myself pay arenow at the disposal of the government, via social programs, etc. The RH bill, with all its loopholes, is just one of them. Then again, this bill will not give free contraceptives to horny husbands but to the wives (who, as plain housewives, clearly cannot afford to buy them) of these selfish husbands, so they can now protect themselves (by no longer getting pregnant) every single time they have to give in to their selfish husbands' demand for sex. Now, if viewed this way, how could one oppose the bill?

    Undeniably, poverty is a multi-faceted problem that demands a multi-faceted solution. But, obviously, we have to start somewhere. The bill tends to target that part of the population that is a burden to the state, that which does not contribute at all to society. Think about this for a moment: what if all tricycle/jeepney drivers, garbage collectors, etc., had only 1 child or 2 at most, wouldn't these children be better fed, clothed, even educated and, consequently, better contributors to our society? The bill, through its education component, will espouse responsible parenthood – parents who clearly cannot afford to raise even 1 child should postpone having children until such time they can raise them properly! Conversely, those who can afford to properly feed, clothe and educate as many children as they can, may continue to do so. The bill does not curtail anybody's right, it simply gives them a choice via education!

    Lastly, the bill, through its education component, aims to debunk the clergy's indoctrination of the poor segment of our society that "children are a blessing from God" and that "the more children one has, the more help the parents will have"! Children are only blessings when the parents can responsibly feed, clothe and educate them, not in sending them to the streets to fend for themselves, to feed off garbage dumps, or to sniff glue just to suppress hunger pangs or forget hardship. I don't believe any right-thinking parent, once enlightened, will consider this a blessing!

    The intent here is to clarify the misconceptions above. I invite other readers to comment as they see fit…

    • Serious mo! Matlino ka sana. Hindi mo lang ginagamit.

      The author is PRO RH bill. He was being sarcastic to those who are against it..

      Jeez! Try reading the comments.. You’d be surprise just how many idiots can be squeezed into one Article.

      • Perhaps it is YOU who missed the whole point. In case you still don't get it, I am for the bill. This is clearly evident from what I wrote. The post was for those opposing it blindly. Please read my post again, or my other previous comments since you so advised me to read the comments section…

      • Better yet, read all my previous comments by simply clicking on my account. Perhaps then you'd realize that your comment was not the kind I was actually eliciting…

        • Responsible parenthood is good. However, having a mindset that children are mere mouths to feed is not. Its quite dangerous. Even from a practical standpoint. Look at Europe. After having this kind of mindset for decades, their population is somewhat imploding. They are even actively encouraging families to have more kids now. You can easily research this on the net. If people can't raise their kids, then empower them. I think its a better use of taxpayer's money. People can be very enterprising given the opportunities of education, and a level playing field. Don't short change the poor that they can't raise their families. Give them jobs and opportunities. Provide access to capital. Filipinos in other countries are doing well because these are available to them.

          • Once again, you're not comparing apples with apples! The countries where our OFWs go to are highly-developed countries, from an economic standpoint, whereas the Phils. is a 3rd-world country! That alone should debunk your argument that we are not overpopulated.

            As to your argument about aging populations after population-control measures were adopted, I just have 2 comments: a) the RH bill does not impose a 1-child policy (like China before) or a 2-child policy (the ideal number it espouses for poor pinoys). It merely suggests that if you can't responsibly raise 10 kids, then you're better off having only say, two! By the way, YOU are not the target of the bill, as you are obviously educated, but those who live in squatter areas, etc. To me, that is not population control per se, but more of population management. b) those countries with aging populations are classic examples of that old adage that "too much of anything is bad". They being the first countries to implement such drastic measures, it took them a long while to slam on the breaks and reverse its negative effects. At best, any country now that proposes such drastic measure (the RH bill is not that kind by any stretch of one's imagination), will be guided by those (earlier) countries which first employed them.

          • Well, my point is, how come most Pinoys in places where the population is larger, are well off?  The population is therefore not the problem.  There must be something else in those places that allow them to prosper despite having a larger population.  Being a 3rd world country is just a label.  Rather than spend resources on population management, let’s find out what made those countries be developed “despite” having a larger population than ours, and emulate it.  That is my point.It’s not so much having a policy to control the number of children that caused their population implosion problem (i.e. I don’t even think countries in Europe had that), but it’s the attitude that “more people are just more mouths to feed.”  That attitude is so hard to reverse once you have it.  That’s what is causing Europe’s difficulties reversing the trend.  What’s next, legalizing genocide?  Thanks for the nice exchange of ideas sir.

          • I already replied to the population issue you raised (in one of your previous comments). Why pinoys working in 1st-world countries are better off than those living in their own 3rd-world country? Do I really have to answer that? And on that sole point you base your conclusion that population is therefore not the problem! Thanks too for your interesting ideas..

          • Actually I do know the answer.  It was a rhetorical question somewhat.  Anyhow, it’s because of the spirit of enterprise and the right conditions for it to bloom.  In these countries, people are given the opportunity to freely create income/ wealth.  So I say let’s empower people, provide the opportunities, education and capital.  I am an entrepreneur and I have seen how my workers (most of whom reached only the high school level) were able to improve their status in life, and became proud of themselves because they have work.  Given the opportunities, people will do what is needed to earn a livelihood.  Wag lang makialam ang corrupt na gobyerno and let people do their thing.  Government should just make sure the infrastructure and the right systems are in place. That’s what we should focus on, not population.  Apart from other things, people mean markets and labor.  Yan ang problema ng Europe ngayon.  Pababa na ang population nila, and wala na bata.  It’s precisely because of the attitude that more people are just more mouths to feed.  So who will take care of them in a few years when they are old and unproductive?  The current generation supports the previous generation.  That’s why they need migrants and are encouraging people to have children.  So, yes, I believe population is not the problem.  People are smart, give the opportunities and empower them, they will find a way to support themselves. 

17. NICE article… sarcasm at its best!

18. Sorry, but I couldn't edit the last part of the mesage…

19. For the love of God, let me say this before thousands more out there embarrass themselves!

    1) first of all, this article is in a satire form which necessarily uses a lot of SARCASM to stress a point or give it a funny slant. Thus, the article is supposed to be funny, nothing more!

    2) the reasons the writer cited here ("the Phils is not overpopulated…", "the priests are never wrong…") for which the writer supposedly switched sides (though he obviously remains a staunch pro), are the very reasons propounded by the pro-life/church who conducted that seminar. REPEAT: these are NOT the writer's beliefs but those who vehemently oppose the RH bill.

    3) the writer, using his own style of writing, used a lot of sarcasm to refute all these baseless, illogical and fallacious arguments dished out by those opposing it blindly! Now, it may appear as childish or unfounded, as some readers have said, but that's precisely the point – the childishness of the arguments of the anti group. The whole point is to make you laugh, not get you fuming mad at the writer's way of getting his point across.

    Hopefully, after this post, subsequent comments would be more logical, thought provoking, etc.

    4)
    3) the writer used a lot of sarcasm to show how baseless,

20. ok here is the joke for RH bill

    nobya. papa buntis ako
    nobyo. ha bakit? ok no problem ipa RH Bill natin

    anak:. naduduwal
    ama:. buntis ka ba ?
    anak: oo papa
    ama: walang hiya ka! hala pumunta ka sa doktor pa RH bill mo.

    Gf: Fren nagbunga ang 1 nite stand natin.
    Bf: ano ? pa RH bill mo baka makrating sa syota ko.

    anak: papa, mama may sasabhin ako. buntis ako
    ama: gaga sabay sampal at mura sa anak
    ina: dear hayaan mo na. ipa RH bill nalang natin sya.

    syota: may sasahin ako nabuntis ako
    tanga bf: sino ama?
    syota: yung kaibigan mo. pero ok lang pa RH bill ko
    tanga bf: mabuti yan ang gagawin mo.. ngayon na!

    mabait na nobyo: totoo ba buntis ka?. bakit mo nilihim?
    syota: oo 1 buwan na. papalaglag ko nga
    mabait na nobyo: ayoko! ibigay mo na lang sa akin anak ko
    syota: hoy may karapatan ako sa sarili ko. baka gusto mo ihampas ko sa mukha mo RH biil noh?

    mister: dear ayoko na
    misis: gusto ko pa, ito o marami pa. bigay ni RH yan

    asawa: ano ka ba! puro supot lang dala palagi pag uwi mo. hala ilaga mo yan at kainin.
    bana: dear naman. halika ka na matulog na tayo.

    misis: bakit buntis si inday? seguro ikaw ang ama.?
    mister: aba di ko kasalanan dear. kasi nakikita ko, pinupulot sa basura at pinapalobo nya.

    news update:

    Tourism was in again the highest earning agency. ano pa nga ba.

    Survey: 8 in 10 above 13 yrs old, may karanasan na.

    condom industries. up its investment by 50%

    gobyerno nagtalaga ng condom land fill na. (alam ko sobra na hahaha)

    gobyerno nababahala maraming matatanda walang nag aalaga.

    3 bilyon na pondo sa RH bill parang lobo pumotok at di na nakita

    balita

    anomalya sa pagbili ng mga contraceptives ikinasa.

    congressman nang rape. pero ang depensa naka condom naman daw sya. (hehehe)

    sad but true

    my ways are pro RH but my conscience is Anti Rh. But its about responsibility : wag nyo ako pamarisan. the sinner is more believable. than the one preaching its a sin.

    RH bill had its good meritsits a bill with lots of good little bills that benefits us. but its like a 3 layered cake. only one is the real cake the others are just cartoon with icings and flowerettes. Thats why its so good to see but you get disappointed when the groom cut the real cake and you left out with an empty plate. Its Ironic that this bill was co authored by a woman. who is patriotic in his ways and fashion. a modern filipina in a sense and the way she dresses. But is this the best and last recourse you can think to help your fellow filipina. indeed your the real pandora box. passing this bill is like erasing that guilt in every in action and making everyone a modern pontius pilate. its legal so why should i be guilty. i like the guy but i dont want a child. I dont need condom give me a job so i can feed my children.

21. This article just shows how ignorant this guy is about the real issues behind the RH Bill. Of course it's obvious the guy is pro RH Bill. Consider this: rights are not absolute, their is also the right of the unborn to live and most contraceptives are abortifacients; having a large population is not the cause of poverty, we are at a period of unprecendented wealth creation in the world, so the problem is it's proper distribution; and yes, other countries with declining populations are in deep shit, ask an economist; RH Bill is not just about sex, in any case, you don't need to be able to engage in sex to know what is right or wrong about the RH Bill; duuuh!!?

22. I didn't get at first… but I was amazed, on how it was cleverly written!
    SARCASM at its finest! 😛

23. this guy is stupid

24. -3 oks lang yan… di naman kasi talaga maintindihan ang comment ko ehh… mahina talaga ako sa english… sowee :)… ang haba kasi ng sinabi ko.. paikliin ko na lang… sinabi ko kasi yung tungkol sa companies at saka yung pabahay dahil sa sinabi ng author yung problema ni "joey"…

    philippines is not overpopulated but manila is overpopulated dahil 40,000+ persons/sq.km. at mas marami pa ito sa tokyo na may 6000- person/sq.km. lang…

    so ang isa sa mga solution ng government ay pabahay, pero hindi ito masyadong nag-work dahil ayaw ng mga mahihirap na lumipat sa bundok pero magiging mas asenso sa sila sa mga lugar na konti tao kasi mapupunta sa kanila ang supplies na wala sa manila…

    so isang solusyon ulet… rh bill.. pero tinututulan nito ng simbahan…

    wala namang mali ang rh bill at saka kapag pinatupad na 'to and pwede lang gumamit ay yung nasa hustong edad…

    dadami ang premarital sex at pangagaliwa..? dati pa lang marami na… sobrang hirap kalabanin ang "libog" alam nyo ba…? actually bababa ito dahil madami ang tututok sa controbersyal na bill na to…

    at saka pag ginawa nila ang labag, desisyon nila yon, may batas ang gobyerno laban dyan at "di pinakikialaman ng diyos ang lahat ng desisyon ng tao"…

    at saka lahat ng tao nagkakamali, kahit kaw na ang pinakabanal na tao sa mundo, kasi pag di ka nagkakamali edi baka ikaw ang diyos….di ba..?

25. tawang tawa lang ako :)))) sarcasm at its finest!

26. The article just shows how ignorant this guy is on the real issues behind the RH Bill. Obviously the guy is pro RH Bill. His views are too simplistic. Consider these: having a large population is not the cause of poverty, the world is at a period of unprecedented wealth creation , the problem is it's proper distribution, address this by providing opportunities to people (i.e. better to focus resources on education and fighting corruption for instance); rights are never absolute, the unborn has also the right to live and most contraceptives are abortifacients; countries with declining populations are truly in deep shit, ask an economist; ask any successful businessman, people are the most important asset of any business, or of any economy for that matter; just because most people are engaging in something, say pre marital sex, doesn't make it any more right or wrong; the RH Bill is not about allowing or prohibiting people from having sex, in any case, you don't have to engage in sex to know what is right or wrong about the RH Bill. Duuh!?

27. This article is not even funny because the writer is just as ignorant as the argument that he is attacking.

    What a pointless article.

    • Agree he is not funny. But you are funny because you didnt get that he is being satirical. hahhahah

      A lot of people already posted what the author meant.. Still you didnt get it. LOL.

28. genius 🙂 i almost quit reading on the first part im glad i didnt. good job sir 🙂

29. i love this article!!!!! satire at its best! 🙂

30. Well played sir, well played. Thanks for this.

31. wow, 2,915 comments and a lot of them still don't understand what the satire conveys! now I understand why some of those who understood the article couldn't control themselves and had to throw invectives at those who clearly didn't. to them I say, "blessed are the dense for they shall be rewarded…wherever". amen.

32. Bakt ganun, OA naman response ng mga proRH, as if sila na talaga ang matatalino. lolz.. As if, paniwalang paniwala sila na Perfect Bill ang RH BILL.. kung may proRH na naging antiRH eh sasabihin nalihis na daw.. hahaha… katawa lang. lolz.. NO TO RH BILL. sayang saya ngayon si Garin yan, author ng RH BILL, tingnan mo dun mansion nila sa Iloilo, at hekta hektaryang ari-arian, nagpapalakihan lang.. tsk tsk.. goodluck PINAS!

33. great article!ü it was a good thing i read it all. great way to awaken minds of millions.too bad a lot of the people who made comments didnt get the idea..haha

34. I had a serious read in here. Until I got in the end, which raise my eye brow and laugh… you said.. 'The RH Bill is wrong because the priest said so, and priests are never wrong'… I may not be a holy person, yeah I commit a sin because I am a human being, and you my brother/sister also commit sin because you're a human being. And these Priests you are referring to, are human being as well, I hope you get the analogy. So DON'T fucking tell they will never be wrong on what they are doing or saying. Are you blind? Didn't our God give the Freedom to choose?

    You have some valid points in your issue here. But i'd say that these one is the most stupid thing you could have said.

    And one more thing, have you ever been in EDSA from Monday to Friday at may pasok o baka naman nandoon ka lang pagHoliday? or have you ever ride the MRT at rush hour? Have you been to Payatas? Where in the Philippines do you actually live?

    • HAHA Serious read my ass. Didnt recognize that it was a satire? Dude, the writer is WITH Rh bill. DO NOT TELL ME THAT YOU BELIEVED IN THE DINOUSARS PART AS WELL. Every fact up there is mostly fake, in liew to support the RH Bill. Which I support as well.

    • Bobo mo. Satire yan.

      "you have some valid points there" –Bobo ka nga.. He's making a joke out of everything.

35. First and foremost, binigyan tayo ni Lord nang utak to know what is right and what is wrong sa reality…bakit natin pag pipilitan na sundin ang go and multuply kung hindi mo naman kaya buhayin yung bata na ibubuo ninyo? madaling sabihin nang iba na dapat gobyerno ang sasagot at sisihin kung hindi mapakain nang mga magulang ang kanilang mga anak…we have to face the truth na hindi talaga kaya nang gobyerno kaya magkaroon naman tayo nang AWA sa mga bata na mabubuo at paglaki nila makikita mo lang naman sa side walk palaboylaboy, ipinamimigay, gutom, nagnanakaw, dahil sa kahirapan..matutulongan nyo kaya kayong mga AYAW SA RH BILL? maka pag bigay kaya kayo nang tulong kahit isang latang gatas man lang o note book sa pag aaral nila?

    Ang contraceptive naman ay iba sa abortion which some misterpreted it…ang pag kakaalam ko ang abortion ay ang pag patay nang ma roon nang buhay while contraception ay wla pang buhay ang pinipigilan mo…wala kang pinapatay pag gumamit ka nang CONDOM, or pills or whatever..yung masama kung buntis na at pinalaglag mo..eh hindi pa buntis yan eh… saan ba nag uumpisa ang sinasabi na LIFE? di ba pag may blood flow na ang embryo which the sgn is his heartbeat? sa pag kakaalam ko ang heartbeat nang baby sa tiyan starting 2weeks so it means life of embryo begins in 2weeks..so napakalabo nang iniisp nang iba na naging abortion ang pag gamit nang contraceptive eh wala pang buhay ang semilya…pano kasi ang mga nagsasaabi na ayaw nila sa RH bILL karamihan, mga walang anak, mayayaman, bakla, tomboy, o mga hindi kaya magkaroon nang anak in short BAOG….paano na lang ang mga mahihirap na fertile na kada mag sex buntis? We have to face the truth and reality na hirap tayo sa maraming anak not only because of population pero dahil sa personal needs…

    • Didnt you realize he is PRO RH bill like you? Satire yung article.

      Serious mo.

36. -3 o-3 oks lang yan… di naman kasi talaga maintindihan ang comment ko ehh… mahina talaga ako sa english… sowee :)… ang haba kasi ng sinabi ko.. paikliin ko na lang… sinabi ko kasi yung tungkol sa companies at saka yung pabahay dahil sa sinabi ng author yung problema ni "joey"…

    philippines is not overpopulated but manila is overpopulated dahil 40,000+ persons/sq.km. at mas marami pa ito sa tokyo na may 6000- person/sq.km. lang…

    so ang isa sa mga solution ng government ay pabahay, pero hindi ito masyadong nag-work dahil ayaw ng mga mahihirap na lumipat sa bundok pero magiging mas asenso sa sila sa mga lugar na konti tao kasi mapupunta sa kanila ang supplies na wala sa manila…

    so isang solusyon ulet… rh bill.. pero tinututulan nito ng simbahan…

    wala namang mali ang rh bill at saka kapag pinatupad na 'to and pwede lang gumamit ay yung nasa hustong edad…

    dadami ang premarital sex at pangagaliwa..? dati pa lang marami na… sobrang hirap kalabanin ang "libog" alam nyo ba…? actually bababa ito dahil madami ang tututok sa controbersyal na bill na to…

    at saka pag ginawa nila ang labag, desisyon nila yon, may batas ang gobyerno laban dyan at "di pinakikialaman ng diyos ang lahat ng desisyon ng tao"…

    at saka lahat ng tao nagkakamali, kahit kaw na ang pinakabanal na tao sa mundo, kasi pag di ka nagkakamali edi baka ikaw ang diyos….di ba..?

37. haha….I think the author is a PRO…gusto ko sabihin angbobo ng ibang nag-comment dito natututwa ako basahin…parang mga classmate ko na mahilig kumopya…minsan ginawa ko mali isinagot ko kinopya parin(PWEDE MAGBASA NG MAAYOS AT INTINDIHIN MGA SIR)…naiisip ko lang na…di nyo iniintindi binabasa nyo 🙂

38. Wahahaha ganda ng pagkasulat mo… I really like this article.. This guy is trying to point out sumthing kung hindi makuha ng karamihan un ewan ko na lang…. isa syang PRO RH BILL solid!! wahahahaha… u made my day dude! lemme share this to my friends.. 😛

39. Nice one Dustin Celestino.

    Really guys, some of you are debating against this article seriously. Why don't you read the whole article again and ask yourself if you really get the message it's giving.

    This article and the other stupid comments really gave me a good laugh.

    hehehe….. XD

40. I mean, do you really want to be a dinosaur? lol… nice one there!

41. what the philippines need is contraception cos less filipinos equals less poverty. yea right.

    yea the bill should be passed right away cos our government is really good at implementing programs. so good that most filipinos got on thinking that there is no actual family planning program and that artificial methods of contraception is not an option/available at our local health centers/hospitals until now. so good, that most mothers still don't seek pre-, peri- and post natal care. and that post abortion care is not offered by our health care institutions. and that there is no informed choice when availing these services. so good that there's enough skilled health care providers in every barangays and each and every filipino has full access to these services. so good that with RH Bill, i can now see a major, major change.

42. That's why I want to support the RH bill. We need to produce quality people. We need to eliminate impulsive and stupid people. (especially to those who commented badly at this article).
    THIS ARTICLE IS UNDER HUMOR!!

    SARCASM at its finest sir Dustin 😀

43. are you sure you know the truth behind it now?
    The RH bill doesn't teach the YOUTH to use condoms, contraceptions or pills during sex, it will teach them about anatomy and physiology about the sex organs, their FUNCTIONS, prenatal period, how babies were formed, the process of labor and pregnancy and about health. when we say SEX EDUCATION, it doesn't mean that we educate the youth about SEX(intercourse), we educate them about sex (gender! their differences, likeliness and functions!) it will not " practically encouraging our people to engage in immoral activities." but it will PREVENT the YOUTH having intercourse because they will have an eye opener (pag teenager ka, pag nakapanood ka ba ng video ng nanganganak, hindi ka ba matatakot? or pag video ng inaabort na baby hindi ka ba mandidiri?)
    why are you saying Filipinos are well educated about sex? havent you noticed? teenagers who are prone to teenage pregnancies are girls performing bad in their class, have low grades and came from public schools.
    we all know that teenage years ire the years of curiosity in this age, they are adventurous and open to new ideas. the thing you said that parents talk to their children about sex without feeling awkward isnt actually true (maybe in your family thats how open sex is). Filipino parents actually remind their sons or daughters TO PRESERVE THEIR VIRGINITY TO THEIR HUSBANDS and they are not open about sex topics. rh bill will encourage parents to talk about sex education to their children (not to talk on how to make a tiger growl or advice them to use condoms with their boyfriends) but talk to them why virginity should be preserve, the function of sex in marriage, the function of their organs, what happens during pregnancy and what sex really is so teenagers wouldn't run in the internet to search what they wanna know about sex.

    • I hope you don't mind my asking, but did you really understand the satire you just read? I suggest you read it again and see if you would still feel the same way after understanding what the author was really trying to convey…

      • Isa pang kapatid ni Rashine. Lol!

        Nagpapatawa yung author.

44. andami na talagang mga evil dito sa mundo… kayong lahat na nag comment mga evil… sinapian na kayo ni satanas… maraming namamatay sa maling akala… im an anti RH bill… coz i love God.. kayong mga pro RH bill mga evil… please come to Jesus now…

45. Dear writer:

    You lost me on the conspiracy theory thing….but I so like your theory why dinosaurs are extinct.

    Thank you for sharing your wisdom, too bad some people just don’t get it.

46. now i know why it was categorized under HUMOR. 🙂

47. SERIOUSLY, PEOPLE? You think this article is for real? Yung mga akalang totoo ito at cinicriticize yung author, baka gusto niyong basahin ulit yung article para magets niyo yung message. Sakit sa ulo din yung ibang Pro-RH who obviously didn’t understand that the author sides with them.

    It’s called sarcasm, everyone. It’s actually funny and entertaining when you actually understand it.

    • yep. it's pure reverse psychology

48. Reverse Psychology! :))

49. Sweet sarcasm there, Mr. Dustin. You rock.

50. " In my opinion, these abortion cases will not lessen because women will continue to have abortions regardless of whether they are pregnant or not."
    BOBO MO MEN.

Comments are closed.