A Call to Restore Sexual Orientation in UN Resolution against Extrajudicial Executions

On November 2010, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly voted to remove a reference to sexual orientation from a key resolution condemning extrajudicial killings. For the past ten years, the Resolution on Extrajudicial, Summary, and Arbitrary Executions has urged states to “to investigate promptly and thoroughly… all killings committed for any discriminatory reason, including sexual orientation. The amendment removing the reference to sexual orientation was adopted with79 votes in favor, 70 against, 17 abstentions and 26 absent. The Philippines was among the seventeen states that abstained.

Today, December 21, 2010, the UN General Assembly will vote on a motion to restore “sexual orientation” in the text of the resolution. The following is a letter from the Filipino Freethinkers urging the Philippine government to uphold the rights of Filipino lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender (LGBTs) by voting to restore the reference to sexual orientation.

21 December 2010

H.E. President BENIGNO C. AQUINO III

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

HON. ALBERTO G. ROMULO

Secretary, Department of Foreign Affairs

H.E. (Mr.) Libran N. Cabactulan

Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary

Permanent Mission of the Republic of the Philippines to the United Nations

556 5th Avenue

New York, NY

Dear Sirs,

We, the members of the Filipino Freethinkers, are writing to you as allies of the Filipino lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community and advocates of equal rights for LGBTs. We urge you to vote for restoration of the category sexual orientation in the Resolution on Extrajudicial Summary, and Arbitrary Executions.

In the Philippines and all over the world, LGBTs continue to be victims of abuse and extrajudicial killing. In 2010 alone, the non-government organization Rainbow Rights Project, Inc. (R-Rights) reported 11 documented cases of local killings based on actual or perceived sexual orientation. Given the lack of policies against discrimination and hate crimes, it is highly probable that many more cases go undocumented and unnoticed. Overseas Filipino workers are also vulnerable to torture and killing based on actual or perceived sexual orientation, especially in countries where consensual same-sex behaviour is deemed criminal. By abstaining from the previous vote on the amendment to the resolution, the Philippine government has turned a blind eye to the realities faced by Filipino LGBTs.

All too often, these grave violations of human rights are motivated by an irrational hatred of sexual minorities, or committed in the name of religious fundamentalism.  As advocates of reason, science, and secularism, we condemn these forms of human rights violations, and we urge you to do the same. We believe that hate crimes and killings on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity—whether or not they are based on religious dogma—should have no place in a state that has committed to promote, uphold, and protect human rights for all. We implore you to vote to restore the reference to sexual orientation in the text of the resolution on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary killings.

Sincerely,

Filipino Freethinkers

www.filipino-freethinkers-22d5b3.ingress-earth.easywp.com

9 comments

  1. In this CRUCIAL vote Filipino respresentative to UN ABSTAINED! Let us now call for the REMOVAL of H.E. Libran Nuevas Cabactulan as Ambassador and Permanent Representative to United Nations!

    • I completely agree with you, Marlon (and Erik in the comment above) that this second abstain vote is deeply disappointing. I do think, though, that the decision to vote that way cannot be attributed solely to Mr. Cabactulan. From what I've heard, decisions like this reflect the stand of the executive branch of the Philippine government–including, of course, the big cheese himself, President Aquino. So I think we should continue to make our dissent clear to the DFA and to the president. Calling for Cabactulan's removal could very well lead to the subsequent appointment of some other ambassador who will continue to vote this way on LGBT issues.

    • That does seem to be the case. A victory for all those who support the equal treatment of all persons regardless of sexual orientation. It is very sad that we even have to fight for basic rights for our brothers and sisters. It's even more sad that our own representative decided to sit this one out.

    • Thanks for the link! I'm happy about the way the vote went. But as I said in my other comment, I'm disappointed in the way the Philippine representative to the UN voted. It seems that the current administration is lukewarm at best about LGBT rights, and I worry about what that will mean for things like the Anti-discrimination Bill (which should have been passed a long, long time ago).

    • Hi Mithi! 🙂 Merong mga individuals from the UP community na nagpadala at nag-share din ng similar statements of their own volition (like my colleague Eric who teaches LGBT psychology). It's also possible that orgs like UP Babaylan released their own statements.

      If you're thinking about a statement from the entire UP community or even UPD community, though, don't count on it. Did you read Pecier's post complaining about how a certain anti-RH bill statement makes it seem (whether intentionally or not) as if UP as a whole does not support the RH bill? Releasing a UP statement on this issue would be problematic for the same reasons. UP students, faculty, staff, and alumni are all part of the "UP community", and to release a statement on our behalf implies that there is a consensus among us about this issue. Given the diversity of views (and prejudices) that exist in UP, I doubt that such a consensus exists. 🙂

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here