<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faith as reason?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/</link>
	<description>A fellowship of atheists, agnostics, deists, humanists, skeptics, and freethinkers in the Philippines and around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caяl</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>Caяl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; First, the article in Wikipedia can be collaborated in other books. If Wikipedia declares that light speed is 299,792, 465 we can always check it using other bo.. 
 
John, i think you mean corroborated not collaborated </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; First, the article in Wikipedia can be collaborated in other books. If Wikipedia declares that light speed is 299,792, 465 we can always check it using other bo.. </p>
<p>John, i think you mean corroborated not collaborated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up, I always have these issues with words that have many meanings hehe </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up, I always have these issues with words that have many meanings hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>Gloria Arroyo can reason that she succumbs to corruption because it would be good for additional wealth and power for her. Of course she used perfect reason. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gloria Arroyo can reason that she succumbs to corruption because it would be good for additional wealth and power for her. Of course she used perfect reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinoyatheist</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>pinoyatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>1. a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc.: the reason for declaring war. 
2. a statement presented in justification or explanation of a belief or action. 
3. the mental powers concerned with forming conclusions, judgments, or inferences. 
4. sound judgment; good sense. 
5. normal or sound powers of mind; sanity. 
6. Logic. a premise of an argument. 
7. Philosophy. a. the faculty or power of acquiring intellectual knowledge, either by direct understanding of first principles or by argument. 
b. the power of intelligent and dispassionate thought, or of conduct influenced by such thought. 
c. Kantianism. the faculty by which the ideas of pure reason are created. 
 
In this article I was using definition (3) and it seems you are using definition (2). Same word...different meaning. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc.: the reason for declaring war.<br />
2. a statement presented in justification or explanation of a belief or action.<br />
3. the mental powers concerned with forming conclusions, judgments, or inferences.<br />
4. sound judgment; good sense.<br />
5. normal or sound powers of mind; sanity.<br />
6. Logic. a premise of an argument.<br />
7. Philosophy. a. the faculty or power of acquiring intellectual knowledge, either by direct understanding of first principles or by argument.<br />
b. the power of intelligent and dispassionate thought, or of conduct influenced by such thought.<br />
c. Kantianism. the faculty by which the ideas of pure reason are created. </p>
<p>In this article I was using definition (3) and it seems you are using definition (2). Same word&#8230;different meaning. <img src='http://filipinofreethinkers.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: innerminds</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>innerminds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>The good thing about Wikipedia is that it will notify you if an article or part of an article lacks citation or references or might contain disputed statements. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good thing about Wikipedia is that it will notify you if an article or part of an article lacks citation or references or might contain disputed statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justinaquino</title>
		<link>http://filipinofreethinkers.org/2010/01/30/faith-as-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>justinaquino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filipinofreethinkers.org/?p=2870#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>The length of your study is far outside the capacity and the range of the theologians who only work with their arbitrary epistemology. 
 
If they can grasp this, I can imagine what argument they would use to contest. Those who can&#039;t, in the otherhand, I&#039;m curious what they will say for the sake of contradiction. 
 
Awesome. :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The length of your study is far outside the capacity and the range of the theologians who only work with their arbitrary epistemology. </p>
<p>If they can grasp this, I can imagine what argument they would use to contest. Those who can&#039;t, in the otherhand, I&#039;m curious what they will say for the sake of contradiction. </p>
<p>Awesome. <img src='http://filipinofreethinkers.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

